SUBJECT: Prayer
QUESTION: Should We Pray to GOD or Only to Christ?
ANSWER:
There was once an argument going around that one should only
pray to Christ. The following text shows how this argument
is in error. We will see that though one can pray to Jesus
Christ and address Him in prayer, we are to pray to God, the
Father.
Do we have access to the Father, or only to Christ? What
does it mean to ask "in the name of Jesus Christ"?
GOD'S Church was once accused of error in addressing prayers
to God the Father.
Shall We Obey Christ?
The Church of God OBEYS the HEAD of this Church, who is
Jesus Christ. What did He teach and command?
One of His disciples said to Jesus. "Lord, teach us to
pray."
"And He said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father
which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done ..." (Luke 11:1-2).
NOTICE! Jesus, teaching His disciples, instructed "When ye
pray, say, OUR FATHER which art in heaven." This false
accuser says we are WRONG if we obey that instruction. IF
JESUS CHRIST be your Saviour; Lord and Master, and High
Priest, FOLLOW HIM! If this dissenter be your lord and
master, then follow him.
Notice again, from Matthew's version of the "sermon on the
mount."
"But when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when
thou hast shut thy door, PRAY TO THY
FATHER which is in secret: and THY FATHER which seeth
in secret shall REWARD THEE openly."
(Matthew 6:5-6).
NOTICE! "When thou prayest ... PRAY TO THY FATHER." This is
a command. This is the teaching of the Head of our Church.
Will we listen to Christ, and obey Him, or listen to
misguided and self-willed dissenters bent on accusing,
discrediting, dividing God's Church, and drawing a personal
following after themselves?
Notice, further, there is promise of THE ANSWER, when we
address THE FATHER in prayer: "... and thy FATHER
SHALL REWARD THEE ..."
In verse 8 Jesus adds, further: "for your FATHER knoweth
what things ye have need of, BEFORE YE ASK HIM." It is
God the FATHER who knows what we have asked HIM -- not asked
of Christ!
Next, Jesus instructed us HOW TO PRAY:
"After this manner therefore pray ye: OUR FATHER which
art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. THY
Kingdom come. THY will be done ..." etc. (Verses 9-10).
If you can tear that teaching of Jesus out of the Bible, you
might as well throw your Bible away! Yet this dissenter says
we must NOT obey that teaching! He says that was all
CHANGED, after the crucifixion and resurrection! If it was,
the next step is to say the Sabbath was changed, and
everything Jesus taught!
Did Christ CHANGE It?
Someone once asked why are no prayers recorded AFTER the
four Gospels that are addressed to THE FATHER? The true
answer, of course, is that there were! Yet, this person
argued, "The simple explanation is that Jesus Christ
AUTHORIZED A CHANGE in the manner of prayer He had taught,
just before He was crucified. John 16:24: 'HITHERTO YE HAVE
ASKED NOTHING IN MY NAME: ask, and ye shall receive, that
your joy may be full.' His name was not given for men to
call upon until His ministry was completed. When this was
finished, He instructed us to ask in His name and FROM THIS
TIME, THERE ARE NO RECORDED PRAYERS THAT BEGIN with the
words, 'Our Father.'"
That is the crux of this argument! It is based on the
assumption that to ask "in Jesus name" does NOT mean what
God's
Church teaches -- that is, by His authority -- by His
permission -- but to ask Jesus Himself direct.
Now let us look at the Scripture the argument quotes, and
understand it IN ITS CONTEXT. This argument has put into
this Scripture an exact opposite meaning from its plain and
simple meaning, WHEN WE READ IT ALL. He quoted only the PART
of it he could twist and misapply! What WAS Jesus saying?
Read it ALL:
Jesus was telling His disciples, the night of His last
Passover, just before He was seized to be crucified:
"Nevertheless I tell you the truth; it is expedient for you
that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not
come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you ...
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide
you into all truth ... A little while, and ye shall not see
me: and again a little while, and ye shall see me, because I
go unto the Father but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall
be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy but I
will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your
joy no man taketh from you. And in that day YE SHALL ASK ME
NOTHING. Verily, verily, I say unto you, WHATSOEVER YE SHALL
ASK THE FATHER IN MY NAME, HE will give it you. Hitherto ye
have asked nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive,
that your joy may be full." (John 16:7, 13, 20, 22-24.)
NOTICE IT! Jesus' disciples had been with Him almost day and
night for three and a half years. During that time they had
asked HIM, direct, many things. Was that asking "in His
name?" He said that up until then they had asked NOTHING IN
HIS NAME. But you can find countless Scriptures recording
instances when they asked HIM, DIRECT, many things.
Asking Jesus DIRECT
Notice just a few examples of how, prior to this time, Jesus
disciples had asked HIM, direct, many things:
"And HIS DISCIPLES ASKED HIM, saying, Why then say the
scribes that Elias must come first? And Jesus answered and
said unto them ..." (Matthew 17:10.) But this was not asking
IN HIS NAME, because later, Jesus said: "Hitherto ye have
asked no thing in my name" (John 16:24). So when "His
disciples ASKED HIM," they were not asking "in His name."
"And when He was entered into the house from the people, HIS
DISCIPLES ASKED HIM ..." (Mark 7:17). ASKING "in
His name" did not mean asking HIM direct here, because they
DID ASK HIM, but they had not, as yet, asked "in His name!"
"And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good
for us to be here ..." (Mark 9:5). Peter addressed Christ
direct -- but speaking to Him direct was NOT SPEAKING IN HIS
NAME!
"And when He was come into the house, HIS DISCIPLES ASKED
HIM privately," (Mark 9:28). But they did not ask "in His
name."
"And in the house HIS DISCIPLES ASKED HIM AGAIN ..." (Mark
10:10). Asking HIM direct was not "asking in His name."
"Peter and James and John and Andrew ASKED HIM PRIVATELY
..." (Mark 13:3). But they did not ask "in His name."
Asking HIM, then -- praying to, or speaking to HIM, is NOT
"asking IN HIS NAME!" For plainly, Jesus said in John 16:24,
that all these many times they had asked things of HIM,
direct, in person, was NOT asking "IN HIS NAME!" "Hitherto,"
He said, "ye have asked nothing in MY NAME."
Now Jesus had, previously, instructed them to address their
prayers to THE FATHER, as I have shown above. But He had
NOT, previously, instructed them to ask IN HIS NAME, or by
HIS AUTHORITY, or as having power of attorney to ask FOR
Him, in His place. But now He did authorize them to ask IN
HIS NAME.
And of WHOM did He instruct them to ask IN HIS NAME?
"Whatsoever ye shall ask THE FATHER IN MY NAME, HE will give
it you," instructed Jesus (Verse 23).
WHY do some QUOTE ONLY VERSE 24, AND PUT AN OPPOSITE MEANING
INTO IT, AND OMIT VERSE 23, WHICH PLACES A MEANING ON VERSE
24 EXACTLY OPPOSITE TO THIS ARGUMENT?
Are they omitting it purposely?
In this Scripture -- Jesus' parting Message to His disciples
before His crucifixion, HE DID NOT CHANGE His previous
command to pray to THE FATHER. He REPEATED IT!
But NOW He gave them authority to ask IN HIS NAME. There is
POWER in the name of Christ! His name carries AUTHORITY. He
assured them that when they prayed to THE FATHER, by this
AUTHORITY of HIS NAME, the Father would give them what they
asked!
Notice further! Did Jesus say here, "Do not pray any longer
to THE FATHER -- but from now on pray only to ME direct?
No!! Just the opposite! He said -- NOTE IT -- "in that day"
-- after His resurrection -- after He has gone from them,
and to the Father's throne in heaven -- "ye shall ask ME
NOTHING!"
Until then, they had asked Him many things continually. But
now -- in OUR DAY TODAY -- He said to ask HIM
NOTHING, but to ask THE FATHER, IN HIS NAME!
The words IN HIS NAME do not tell US WHOM to ask. They tell
us How to ask -- that is, by Christ's authority. Jesus told
WHO to ask. He commanded "ASK THE FATHER!"
Christ's Command to
US
This argument states, falsely: "Jesus Christ AUTHORIZED A
CHANGE in the manner of prayer He had taught, just before
He was crucified."
The argument quotes -- or rather MISquotes -- John 16:24. It
is shown above, so plainly a little child can see, that
Jesus did not authorize any change but rather confirmed what
He had taught, now merely adding authority to ask IN HIS
NAME.
EVERYTHING Jesus taught and commanded His disciples is a
teaching and command for us today!
AFTER His resurrection, just before ascending to heaven,
Jesus' first spoken COMMAND was: "Go ye therefore, and teach
all nations, baptizing them in(to)
the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Spirit: TEACHING THEM to observe ALL THINGS WHATSOEVER I
have commanded you." (Matthew 28:19-20).
Jesus had taught and commanded THEM TO PRAY TO THE FATHER.
He had authorized them to address the FATHER IN HIS NAME.
Now, just before parting from them in person, He commanded
them to go into all the world – teaching those whom they
baptized to observe ALL THINGS WHATSOEVER He had commanded
them. He had commanded them to address their prayers to THE
FATHER. So now they were to teach ALL CONVERTS, likewise, to
pray TO GOD THE FATHER.
Meaning of "in Jesus'
Name"
This argument states that the words "IN JESUS' NAME" -- or,
as Christ Himself instructed us, in praying to the Father,
to do it "IN MY NAME" -- does not mean by His authority --
by His instruction or permission -- but, rather, it argues
that to ask "IN JESUS' NAME" is TO ASK JESUS HIMSELF
DIRECTLY.
Now let us look at a few Scriptures and see how ridiculous
this contention is.
Notice Jeremiah 14:14: "Then the LORD said unto me, the
prophets prophesy lies in my name: ..." If "IN MY NAME"
means "ask ME," then these false prophets were prophesying
LIES DIRECT TO THE LORD! Were these false prophets preaching
their lies TO THE ETERNAL, trying to mislead and deceive
HIM? How foolish! He says, same verse: "... they prophesy
UNTO YOU a false vision." They were addressing, NOT the
Eternal, but the PEOPLE. But HOW? "IN CHRIST'S NAME" for He
is the "LORD" spoken of in this verse. Of course they
CLAIMED TO PREACH BY HIS AUTHORITY, but they were lying. He
had not sent them. The very fact that the context shows The
ETERNAL (Christ)
had not sent them, and that they were LYING when they
claimed to be speaking "IN HIS NAME" shows definitely and
positively and finally that they CLAIMED to speak by HIS
AUTHORITY -- only they were lying. "IN MY NAME," here, then,
means "BY MY AUTHORITY!" Consider the 23rd chapter of
Jeremiah. It pronounces woes on the false preachers.
It is a PROPHECY for OUR DAY, NOW! The Eternal tells us,
verse 16, not to listen to the preachers who flatter their
congregations, to inflate their congregations' vanity,
speaking THEIR OWN ideas, but NOT the Word of the Eternal.
Yet they CLAIMED to be representing Christ.
"They say ... The Eternal hath said ..."-- that is, that
they are sent BY Christ, as His representative, with His
words, and therefore BY HIS AUTHORITY. But God says (verse
16): "... they speak a vision of their own heart, and not
out of the mouth of the Eternal." They were lying about
representing Christ -- speaking FOR Him -- by His authority.
"I have NOT sent these prophets," (preachers),
says Christ (Verse 21). Yet they CLAIMED to speak BY HIS
AUTHORITY: "I have heard what the prophets said," says the
Eternal (verse 25), "that prophesy LIES IN MY NAME."
Here again, "IN MY NAME" means "as my authorized
representative," or "by my authority." If it means, as this
deceived
couple argue, "prophesy to or address ME direct," then you
read into it the ridiculously foolish meaning of these false
preachers preaching lies TO CHRIST DIRECT -- but NOT to the
people!
Notice Jeremiah 26:9: "Why hast thou prophesied IN THE NAME
OF THE LORD, saying ..." Jeremiah was not prophesying TO THE
LORD DIRECT. He was not speaking to CHRIST. Christ (The
Eternal) had spoken TO HIM, and Jeremiah had
spoken Christ's words, as CHRIST AUTHORIZED, TO THE PEOPLE!
Here, so plainly all can see, "IN THE NAME OF the LORD"
means by the LORD'S authority -- by His permission -- by His
command. It does not mean TO the LORD. Jeremiah spoke TO the
people. Need we go further?
Jeremiah continued to warn these people: "... for of a truth
THE LORD HATH SENT me unto you to speak all these words in
your ears. Then said the princes and all the people unto the
priests and to the prophets; This man is not worthy to die:
for he hath spoken TO US IN THE NAME OF THE LORD OUR GOD."
(Verses 15-16)
Jeremiah did not speak TO the Eternal -- he spoke TO the
people. But the Eternal sent him. The Eternal authorized him
to address his speech to the people, and speaking by this
authority is plainly designated as speaking to them "IN THE
NAME OF THE LORD." Speaking "in His name" is NOT speaking TO
Christ -- but BY HIS AUTHORITY!
Remember the disciples had addressed many questions to Jesus
direct. Yet He said, "Hitherto have ye asked NOTHING IN MY
NAME." (John 16:24) Hitherto they had asked HIM, direct, on
their OWN initiative -- NOT by Jesus' direction or authority
-- but by their own. But, after He left them and ascended to
heaven, "ye shall ask ME nothing ... Whatsoever ye shall ask
THE FATHER IN MY NAME, HE will give it you." (Verse 23) He
was here and now AUTHORIZING them to ask IN HIS NAME, but
commanding them TO address their prayer to THE FATHER.
Nothing could be plainer.
Apostles Prayed to the
FATHER
Now just one or two points more, and we shall have an END to
these nonsensical and perverted arguments against Christ's
commands. The argument says, as quoted above, that no
prayers were addressed to the Father after the Four Gospels
-- that is, as recorded in the Book of Acts, and other Books
of the New Testament following. This argument even has the
audacity to quote Acts 4:24, 29, and say they were praying
to Jesus, and NOT to the Father!
Peter and John had been put in prison overnight, and
threatened. "And being let go, they went to their own
company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders
had said unto them. And when they heard that they lifted up
their voice to GOD with one accord and said, Lord, thou art
GOD ..." (Acts 4:23-24).
Now TO WHOM were they praying? This dissenter says that
"God" sometimes means Christ -- which is true but apparently
does not know that the word "Lord" also sometimes refers to
THE FATHER, as it does here!
Let's read on. It becomes very PLAIN as TO WHOM they are
praying:
"For of a truth against THY HOLY CHILD JESUS, whom thou hast
anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles
..." etc. (Verse 27).
Jesus is called the holy CHILD of the One to whom they were
praying. Jesus was the child of GOD THE FATHER. SO they were
praying to the FATHER, whom, they said, "THOU hast
anointed." They were praying to the One who had anointed
Jesus with the Holy Spirit. The FATHER anointed Jesus
(Matthew 3:17; Mark 1:10-11). Therefore they were addressing
this prayer TO THE FATHER!
Now notice verses 29-30. The prayer continues: "And now,
Lord, behold their threatenings: and grant unto thy servants
... that signs and wonders may be done BY THE NAME OF THY
HOLY CHILD JESUS."
Again, they were addressing their prayer to THE FATHER of
Jesus. They were NOT asking that signs and wonders might be
done TO Jesus direct -- but that they might be done "BY THE
NAME" of God's Son, Jesus -- BY HIS AUTHORITY!
Quoting Acts 4:24 this argument admits: "Portions of this
prayer appear to be spoken to the Father." Then why
contradict themselves, saying: "Why are there no prayers
recorded after the Gospels ... with any indication that the
prayer is being addressed to the Father?"
Jesus thanked God that these truths are revealed unto BABES,
and hidden from the wise and prudent. A college education
IN THIS WORLD'S COLLEGES can be a very great HANDICAP,
rather than a help. Still, ANYONE can understand the
TRUTH whose heart is willing!
Access to the Father
This argument would deny God's own children access to their
heavenly FATHER. But what IS the very WAY of God, by which
we are converted? Our SINS have cut us off from God (Isaiah
59:1-2). Sin is the transgression of the LAW. There is ONE
Lawgiver -- God the FATHER (James 4:12). Sin cuts us off
from the FATHER. When we repent of sin, our repentance is
toward God the FATHER (Acts 20:21). But saving FAITH is
toward Christ (same verse).
When we repent, and receive Christ as Lord and MASTER, and
are baptized as the symbol of our FAITH toward Christ, then
what happens? The blood of Christ RECONCILES US to the
FATHER (Romans 5:10).
And, once reconciled to the FATHER, He puts HIS SPIRIT into
us, BEGETTING us as HIS BEGOTTEN CHILDREN.
We are not begotten by CHRIST to become sons of Christ.
Jesus is our elder Brother -- the first-born of many
BRETHREN. To be reconciled to the Father for transgression
of HIS Law is to have ACCESS direct to HIM.
Now notice: "For through HIM (Christ)
we both (Jew and Gentile)
HAVE ACCESS by one Spirit UNTO THE FATHER."
(Ephesians 2:18).
Christ has purchased for us and given us direct access to
the Father! He has AUTHORIZED us to go direct to the Father
in PRAYER. Notice again: "... according to the eternal
purpose which He (the Father)
purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord: in whom we have boldness
AND ACCESS with confidence by the faith of Him our Lord
Jesus Christ ... that He would grant you, according to the
riches of His Glory, to be strengthened ..." (Ephesians
3:11-16). The Apostle Paul bowed his knees (both
knees) in prayer direct to THE FATHER!
Why does this argument say no prayers were addressed to the
Father after the Four Gospels?
Colossians 1:3
We give thanks to God and the FATHER of our Lord Jesus
Christ, PRAYING always for you." WHY does this argument deny
this Scripture?
Ephesians 5:20
"Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the
FATHER IN THE NAME OF our Lord Jesus Christ." Praying TO the
FATHER. Yet by authority from Christ, who gives us access to
the Father.
In 51-52 A.D. Paul and Timothy gave thanks to God the Father
(1 Thessalonians 1:1-2).
We are to call on God the FATHER (1 Peter 1:17).
Colossians 1:12-13
"Giving thanks unto the FATHER ... who hath ... delivered us
from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the
kingdom of His dear Son."
If we have the Holy Spirit, "we cry (pray)
Abba, FATHER" (Romans 8:15) as Jesus prayed (Mark 14:36).
Our High Priest
Finally, what about Christ as our High Priest?
WHY is Jesus Christ, the living HEAD of our Church, now
appearing before God the Father, at God's right hand? He is
there to make intercession for us.
"Wherefore He is able also to save them to the uttermost
that come unto GOD by Him, seeing He ever liveth to make
intercession for them." (Hebrews 7:25). Yes, Jesus Christ is
able to save those WHO COME TO GOD THE FATHER – and we have
been given access to come to the Father IN PRAYER -- BY
Christ. We cannot approach the Father by our own merits. We
have none. Christ is the door -- the way. One does not go TO
a door and STOP. He goes on THROUGH the door. Christ gives
us access to GOD. And He INTERCEDES with God FOR US.
This intercession of our blessed HIGH PRIEST DOES NOT MEAN
THAT WE PRAY TO CHRIST AND THAT HE THEN CARRIES OUR REQUEST
TO THE FATHER.
Notice Scriptural proof of this: "Likewise the Spirit also
helpeth our infirmities: for WE KNOW NOT what we should pray
for as we ought: but THE SPIRIT ITSELF MAKETH INTERCESSION
for us example of Christians praying TO the Holy Spirit.
Here is a plain example of Christians NOT KNOWING WHAT TO
PRAY FOR -- but God's Holy Spirit intercedes for them. They
do not pray TO the Spirit, and then the Spirit transmit
their request to God; but rather, the Spirit ITSELF moves
upon God for that which they did NOT ask, since they did not
know WHAT to ask!
In like manner, we have access direct to the Father, to pray
direct to Him by CHRIST'S PERMISSION. Christ, our High
Priest at the Father's side, ALSO petitions the Father for
us -- offering HIS SACRIFICE in lieu of our unworthiness.
Elijah made intercession to God AGAINST Israel (Romans
11:2). This was not acting as a go-between to transmit THEIR
Prayers to God. Paul taught that we HUMANS should make
intercession for ALL MEN (1 Timothy 2:1).
Our FELLOWSHIP
Many of our brethren HUNGER for the FELLOWSHIP of other
brethren. They long to be able to TALK WITH others of like
mind and the same Spirit.
But OUR FELLOWSHIP is first of all "with the FATHER, and
with the Son Jesus Christ." (1 John 1:3).
HOW do we have FELLOWSHIP? By meeting with -- conversing
with!
When we PRAY to the Father, and/or to Christ, we are
speaking to them. When we read and study the Bible, they are
talking to us. The Bible is the Word of GOD. Although Jesus
is the WORD -- the direct author of the Bible -- yet He
spoke only as the FATHER commanded Him. So the Bible is the
WORD to US from both the FATHER and the SON.
When Jesus Christ, our Saviour, High Priest and Lord,
reconciles us to the FATHER -- gives us direct access to the
Father, we have the great HONOR, paid for by Christ's very
life which He gave, to speak directly to the Father.
But our fellowship is also with Jesus Christ, God's divine
SON. Christ is now on the Father's throne with Him, at His
right hand as our High priest. We have fellowship with Jesus
Christ ALSO.
WE DO, WE MAY, WE SHOULD, ALSO PRAY TO JESUS CHRIST! YET THE
teaching and examples of the Bible place overwhelming main
emphasis on praying to the Father.
God's Church does not forbid any to pray to Christ. It is
not so much a matter of to WHICH Person we are to pray. We
do not condemn anyone for praying to Christ. Rather, this
argument condemns God's Church for praying to the Father.
But we DO
SAY that ONE WHO HAS NO FELLOWSHIP WITH THE FATHER BY PRAYER
IS CUT OFF FROM GOD!
back to the top |