| 
					SUBJECT:   Nicolaitans 
					  
					QUESTION:  
					
					What is it about the doctrine of the Nicolaitans that Jesus 
					hates so much? 
					  
					ANSWER:
 Notice some key verses:
 
 Revelation 2:6
 
					But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the 
					Nicolaitans, which I also hate.  
					  
					Revelation 2:14-15 
					14  But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast 
					there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught 
					Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of 
					Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit 
					fornication.  
					15  So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the 
					Nicolaitans, which thing I hate. 
					  
					  
					NICOLAITANS  
					  
					                (nik-o-la'-i-tanz) Nikolaitai): A sect or 
					party of evil influence in early Christianity, especially in 
					the 7 churches of Asia. 
					                 
					1. The Sect: Their doctrine was similar to that of Balaam, 
					"who taught Balak to cast a stumblingblock before the 
					children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and 
					to commit fornication" <Rev 2:14-15>. Their practices were 
					strongly condemned by John, who praised the church in 
					Ephesus for "hating their works" <Rev 2:6>, and blamed the 
					church in Pergamum for accepting in some measure their 
					teaching <Rev 2:15>. Except that reference is probably made 
					to their influence in the church at Thyatira also, where 
					their leader was "the woman Jezebel, who calleth herself a 
					prophetess" (<Rev 2:20>; compare verse 14), no further 
					direct information regarding them is given in Scripture. 
					                 
					2. References: Reference to them is frequent in 
					post-apostolic literature. According to Irenaeus (Adv. Haer., 
					i. 26,3; iii. 10,7), followed by Hippolytus (Philos., vii. 
					36), they were founded by Nicolaus, the proselyte of 
					Antioch, who was one of the seven chosen to serve at the 
					tables <Acts 6:5>. Irenaeus, as also Clement of Alexandria 
					(Strom., ii. 20), Tertullian and others, unite in condemning 
					their practices in terms similar to those of John; and 
					reference is also made to their gnostic tendencies. In 
					explanation of the apparent incongruity of such an immoral 
					sect being founded by one of "good report, full of the 
					Spirit and of wisdom" (compare <Acts 6:3>), Simcox argues 
					that their lapse may have been due to reaction from original 
					principles of a too rigid asceticism. A theory, started in 
					comparatively modern times, and based in part on the 
					similarity of meaning of the Greek "Nikolaus," and the 
					Hebrew "Balaam," puts forward the view that the two sects 
					referred to under these names were in reality identical. Yet 
					if this were so, it would not have been necessary for John 
					to designate them separately. 
					                 
					3. Nicolaitan Controversy: The problem underlying the 
					Nicolaitan controversy, though so little direct mention is 
					made of it in Scripture, was in reality most important, and 
					concerned the whole relation of Christianity to paganism and 
					its usages. The Nicolaitans disobeyed the command issued to 
					the gentile churches, by the apostolic council held at 
					Jerusalem in 49-50 AD, that they should refrain from the 
					eating of "things sacrificed to idols" <Acts 15:29>. Such a 
					restriction, though seemingly hard, in that it prevented the 
					Christian communities from joining in public festivals, and 
					so brought upon them suspicion and dislike, was yet 
					necessary to prevent a return to a pagan laxity of morals. 
					To this danger the Nicolaitans were themselves a glaring 
					witness, and therefore John was justified in condemning 
					them. In writing to the Corinthians, Paul gives warning 
					against the same evil practices, basing his arguments on 
					consideration for the weaker brethren (compare <1 Cor 8>). 
					  
					                LITERATURE.-- Simcox, "Revelation" in the 
					Cambridge Bible; H. Cowan in Hastings, Dictionary of the 
					Bible (five volumes), article "Nicolaitans"; H.B. Swete, The 
					Apocalypse of St. John, lxx ff, 27, 28, 37. -C. M. 
					KERR ~from International 
					Standard Bible Encylopaedia 
					  
					******** 
					  
					NICOLAITANS  
					  
					                [nick oh LAY ih tuns]-- an early Christian 
					heretical sect made up of followers of Nicolas, who was 
					possibly the deacon of <Acts 6:5>. The group is mentioned 
					explicitly only in <Rev. 2:6, 14-15>, where it is equated 
					with a group holding "the doctrine of Balaam," who taught 
					Israel "to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit 
					sexual immorality."
 
 
					                Balaam probably was responsible for the 
					cohabitation of the men of Israel with the women of Moab 
					<Num. 25:1-2; 31:16>. Therefore, the error of this group was 
					moral rather than doctrinal. If the "Jezebel" of <Revelation 
					2:20-23> was a teacher of this sect, as many believe, their 
					sexual laxity was indeed strong. Most likely, they were a 
					group of anti-law practitioners who supported a freedom that 
					became self-indulgence. It may have been the same heresy 
					condemned in <2 Peter 2:15> and <Jude 11>. Some early church 
					leaders believed the Nicolaitans later became a GNOSTIC 
					sect. ~from Nelson's 
					Illustrated Bible Dictionary 
					  
					  
					******** 
					  
					NICOLAITANS  
					  
					                NICOLA'ITANS 
					(nik-o-la'i-tanz). A sect or party that arose in the 
					apostolic period of the church, mentioned twice by name in 
					the book of Revelation (2:6, 15). In the former passage it 
					is said, to the credit of the church in Ephesus, that she 
					shared in the feelings of the Lord concerning the 
					Nicolaitans, viewing them with the hatred they deserved. The 
					charge is made that some in Pergamos (v. 15) held to 
					teachings of the Nicolaitans, who are compared to those who 
					"hold the teaching of Balaam," etc. "The general voice of 
					antiquity accuses them of holding the lawfulness of eating 
					things offered to idols, and of mixing in and encouraging 
					idolatrous worship; and as they are charged with denying God 
					to be the creator of the world, and attributing its 
					existence to other powers, they could unquestionably, on 
					such grounds, permit themselves so to act, and thus far it 
					is probable that the accusation is not ill-founded. The 
					community of women was another doctrine which they are said 
					to have adopted, and their conduct seems to have been in the 
					highest degree licentious" (Imperial Bible Dictionary, s.v.). 
					The origin of the sect will perhaps never be ascertained 
					with certainty. See Nicolas.  
					~from New Unger's Bible 
					Dictionary  
					  
					******* 
					 back to the top
 |