SUBJECT: 2 Kings 2:20-25 Elisha and the she bears
QUESTION: Does this verse not show that God is a cruel
God? Why did God allow this to happen?
ANSWER:
First the verses:
2 Kings 2:20-25
20 And he said, Bring me a new cruse, and put salt therein.
And they brought it to him.
21 And he went forth unto the spring of the waters, and cast
the salt in there, and said, Thus saith the LORD, I have
healed these waters; there shall not be from thence any more
death or barren land.
22 So the waters were healed unto this day, according to the
saying of Elisha which he spake.
23 And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was
going up by the way, there came forth little children out of
the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou
bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them
in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears
out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
25 And he went from thence to mount Carmel, and from thence
he returned to Samaria.
Now the commentaries:
2 Kings 2:24
And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in
the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out
of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
On this occasion only do we find Elisha a minister of
vengeance. Perhaps it was necessary to show, at the outset
of his career as a prophet, that he too, so mild and
peaceful could, like Elijah, wield the terrors of God's
judgments (1 Kings 19:19 note). The persons really punished
were, not so much the children, as the wicked parents (2
Kings 2:23), whose mouth-pieces the children were, and who
justly lost the gift of offspring of which they had shown
themselves unworthy. ~from
Barnes' Notes
Note: This
commentary says that those killed were the wicked parents of
the children. The next commentary shows that those killed
were older; "not irresponsible babes". Regardless, these
individuals were responsible for their actions. Their
affront was to God. They paid the price.
2 Kings 2:23-24
he went up ... unto Beth-el.
Elisha's first 'official' visit, as successor to Elijah, to
Bethel (cf. vv. 2,3), the seat of the calf worship of
Jeroboam (1 Kings 12:29). Little children. Rather, (young
men) (nearim qetannim), plu.) not irresponsible
babes. Both Solomon (1 Kings 3:7) and Jeremiah (Jer 1:6-7)
are called (na`ar) (sing.) These were young people, morally
responsible. Go up, thou bald head. They echoed the words of
the sons of the prophets to Elisha: "The Lord will take away
(up) thy master"
(vv. 3,5). They meant: "Ascend, that we may be rid of thee (and
may continue unreproved in our wicked ways)!" A
bald or shaven head was the mark of a leper and denoted
disgrace (Isa 3:17). While Elisha was probably not yet bald,
the epithet shows that the youths considered him as an
"outcast," like a leper. They despised God's prophet. 24.
Cursed them in the name of the Lord. Their scorn was a
dishonor to God. Hence the promise of divine judgment. They
broke the divine covenant by ridiculing its overseer. Two
she bears ... tare forty and two. Breaking the covenant
brings punishment. The size of the group suggests that the
taunting was prearranged.
~from The Wycliffe Bible Commentary
Note: This same
God of the Old Testament, Jesus Christ is returning to this
earth and there will be a great war (Armageddon). Millions
and millions will die and all this after a great World War
III brought about by the Beast Power in which BILLIONS will
die. All these millions and billions will have their
opportunity in the 2nd resurrection to know the truth of God
and enter into the Kingdom. The first death is not a final
death.
Now here is an explanation of these verses that should clear
up all your concerns:
2 Kings 2:20-25
This event is often construed very negatively:
"How can I believe in a God who would send bears to devour
little children for innocently teasing an old man whose
appearance probably was unusual even for that day" (HSOBX)
But a closer look at the passage show that most of the
assumptions in that position are false, and that other
elements (not explicit in
the words, but present in the historical situation)
illumine the situation.
First, the passage itself:
2 Kings 2:23-24
23 And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was
going up by the way, there came forth little children out of
the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou
bald head; go up, thou bald head.
24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them
in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears
out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
Now, let's look at some of the elements of the historical
background, and the various players in the event:
1. First of all, they weren't "little kids"!
"'Little children' is an unfortunate translation. The Hebrew
expression neurim qetannim is best rendered 'young lads' or
'young men.' From numerous examples where ages are specified
in the Old Testament, we know that these were boys from
twelve to thirty years old. One of these words described
Isaac at his sacrifice in Genesis 22:12, when he was easily
in his early twenties. It described Joseph in Genesis 37:2
when he was seventeen years old. In fact, the same word
described army men in 1 Kings 20:14-15...these are young men
ages between twelve and thirty." [HSOBX]
2. Elisha wasn't "old"--he was the same age as they were!
"But was Elisha an old man short on patience and a sense of
humor? This charge is also distorted, for Elisha can hardly
have been more than twenty-five when this incident happened.
He lived nearly sixty years after this..." [HSOBX]
3. Elisha had JUST FINISHED doing a mercy-miracle for the
entire city of nearby Jericho!!!!
"The chapter closes with two miracles of Elisha. These
immediately established the character of his ministry—his
would be a helping ministry to those in need, but one that
would brook no disrespect for God and his earthly
representatives. In the case of Jericho, though the city had
been rebuilt (with
difficulty) in the days of Ahab (1 Kings 16:34,
q.v.), it had remained unproductive. Apparently the water
still lay under Joshua's curse (cf. Josh 6:26), so that both
citizenry and land suffered greatly (v. 19). Elisha's
miracle fully removed the age-old judgment, thus allowing a
new era to dawn on this area (vv. 20-22). Interestingly
Elisha wrought the cure through means supplied by the people
of Jericho so that their faith might be strengthened through
submission and active participation in God's cleansing work.
(EBCOT)
4. This event took place around a cult city (somewhere
between Bethel and Jericho, a distance of approximately 10
miles),a center of anti-YHWH worship:
"Elisha's sweet memories of Jericho received a souring touch
at Bethel (v. 23). The public insult against Elisha was
aimed ultimately at the God whom he represented. Indeed
Elisha's whole prophetic ministry was in jeopardy; therefore
the taunt had to be dealt with decisively. The sudden
arrival of the two bears who mauled forty-two youths to
death would serve as both an awful sentence on
unbelievers--and thus, too, on Jeroboam's cult city--and a
published reminder that blasphemy against the true God and
his program would be met with swift and certain consequences
(v. 24)." [EBCOT]
5. The harmless "teasing" was hardly that--they were direct
confrontation between the forces of Baal and the prophet of
YHWH that had just healed the water supply (casting
doubt on the power and beneficence of Baal!).
This was a mass demonstration (if
42 were mauled, how many people were in the crowd to begin
with? 50? 100? 400?).:
"As Elisha was traveling from Jericho to Bethel several
dozen youths (young men, not children) confronted him.
Perhaps they were young false prophets of Baal. Their
jeering, recorded in the slang of their day, implied that if
Elisha were a great prophet of the Lord, as Elijah was, he
should go on up into heaven as Elijah reportedly had done.
The epithet baldhead may allude to lepers who had to shave
their heads and were considered detestable outcasts. Or it
may simply have been a form of scorn, for baldness was
undesirable (cf. Isa. 3:17, 24). Since it was customary for
men to cover their heads, the young men probably could not
tell if Elisha was bald or not. They regarded God's prophet
with contempt....Elisha then called down a curse on the
villains. This cursing stemmed not from Elisha pride but
from their disrespect for the Lord as reflected in their
treatment of His spokesman (cf. 1:9-14). Again God used wild
animals to execute His judgment (cf., e.g., 1 Kings 13:24).
That 42 men were mauled by the two bears suggests that a
mass demonstration had been organized against God and
Elisha." [Bible Knowledge
Commentary]
6. There may have been elements of public safety involved:
"A
careful study of this incident in context shows that it was
far more serious than a "mild personal offense." It was a
situation of serious public danger, quite as grave as the
large youth gangs that roam the ghetto sections of our
modern American cities. If these young hoodlums were ranging
about in packs of fifty or more, derisive towards
respectable adults and ready to mock even a well-known man
of God, there is no telling what violence they might have
inflicted on the citizenry of the religious center of the
kingdom of Israel (as Bethel
was), had they been allowed to continue their
riotous course. " [EBD]
7. Elisha didn't actually call out the bears--he merely
pronounced judgment on these demonstrators. God decided what
form the response took:
"Perhaps it was for this reason that God saw fit to put
forty-two of them to death in this spectacular fashion (there
is no evidence that Elisha himself, in imposing a curse,
prayed for this specific mode of punishment), in
order to strike terror into other youth gangs that were
infesting the city and to make them realize that
neitherYahweh Himself nor any of His anointed prophets were
to be threatened or treated with contempt." [EBD]
8. This curse/judgment was part of the covenant
stipulations--it was a reminder of Israel's responsibilities
(and opportunities for
blessings, as well):
"Elisha pronounced a curse similar to the covenant curse of
Lev 26:21-22. The result gave warning of the judgment that
would come on the entire nation should it persist in
disobedience and apostasy (see 2 Chronicles 36:16). Thus
Elisha's first acts were indicative of his ministry that
would follow: God's covenant blessings would come to those
who looked to him (vv. 19-22), but God's covenant curses
would fall on those who turned away from him. [NIV
Study Bible notes, in loc.]
"If you remain hostile toward me and refuse to listen to
me, I will multiply your afflictions seven times over, as
your sins deserve. 22 I will send wild animals against you,
and they will rob you of your children, destroy your cattle
and make you so few in number that your roads will be
deserted." (Lev 26.21f)
9. This visible display of God's power and reality (like
the previous display of His kindness and activity for them)
was
designed to avert a far greater calamity:
"The savagery of wild animals was brutal enough, but it was
mild compared to the legendary cruelty of the Assyrians who
would appear to complete God's judgment in 722 BC The
disastrous fall of Samaria would have been avoided had the
people repented after the bear attack and the increasingly
sever divine judgments that followed it. But instead of
turning back to God, Israel, as would Judah in a later day,
'mocked God's messengers, despised his words and scoffed at
his prophets until the wrath of the LORD was aroused
against his people and there was no remedy' (2 Chron 36:16)"
[HSOBX]
So, this was hardly the atrocity that it is often construed
as--the historical data casts the event into a TOTALLY
different light. It WAS a very significant event for the
religious fortune (and
therefore, future welfare) of the Northern
Kingdom...and it called for decisive revelation from God
about the severity of the people's condition and
situation...
back to the top |